.jpg)
Why?
No one deserves the award better than Dravid. He faced 19 balls and scored 4 runs ( see my earlier post about 5 opt repeated cliches – point no. 5 – I still have some cricket left ). After 19 balls he sacrificed his wicket so India can go and win the match. He could have easily wasted 113 balls to score 5 runs – and then get out – so that the asking rate is impossible to achieve, and also the other batsman would have lost all interest in playing cricket. But he did not do such a thing. The noble soul sacrificed his wicket for a just cause. He deserves to be honoured.
Also he pleasantly surprised the poor crowd who had come to see a defeat or a draw. Man of the match always should be given to the ad model who is instrumental in shaping the victory – who else is responsible for paving the way for an India win other than Dravid.
You think I should be voted the man-of-the-match award committee chairman? Thanks. I am flattered !!
